PLAINTIFFS:
Christopher Crame
Robert Leatham
DEFENDANTS:
360 Management LLC,
AAM LLC ,
Vision Community Management LLC,
Brown Community Management Incorporated,
Cadden Community Management Incorporated,
Capital Consultants Management Corporation,
City Property Management Company,
Colby Management Incorporated,
Cornerstone Properties Incorporated,
EPMI Incorporated,
Golden Valley
Property Management LLC,
Golden Valley
Collections LLC,
Community Asset Management LLC,
K Management Services Incorporated,
Metro Property Services Incorporated,
Morrison Group Incorporated,
Cimros Incorporated,
Ogden & Company Incorporated West,
Dan Peterson Property Management Company LLC,
Planned Development Services Incorporated,
Preferred Communities LLC,
Premier Community Management Incorporated,
Renaissance Community Partners LLC,
Sentry Management Incorporated,
Stratford
Management LLC,
Northcott Bellow & Associates Incorporated,
Management Trust Incorporated
Total Property Management Incorporated
CASE NUMBER: CV2012-095288
COURT: Superior Court of Arizona
in and for the County
of Maricopa
FILED: September 10, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 2012CV01969
COURT: Federal Ninth Circuit - Arizona District Court
OFFICE: Phoenix
Division Office
COUNTY: Maricopa
PRESIDING JUDGE: Susan R. Bolton
FILED: September 14, 2012
COMPLAINT: Class Action, Fair Debt Collections Practices
Violations, Wrongful Lien
Since there are so many companies involved and so many
homeowners affected, it appears this is the reason the attorneys for the
plaintiff are working to make this a class action lawsuit.
A review of the complaint outlines what the
Plaintiff’s are seeking compensation for. The management companies are
accused of violating of the Federal Fair Debt Collections Act by doing things
that only a licensed attorney should do.
Some of the most serious purported violations appear to be:
- Recording debt collection documents;
- Recording of liens;
- Appearing in small claims or justice courts
- Charging legal fees for legal work when a licensed attorney was not used
The defendant management companies are accused of
practicing law without a license. That would constitute the unauthorized
practice of law (UPL) in Arizona.
A ruling in March of 2012 from the State Bar of Arizona,
(UPL Advisory Opinion No.12-02) specifically addressed the concerns raised as a
result of community association management companies providing legal services
on behalf of client associations by non-lawyers.
Here is a link to that ruling: http://www.azbar.org/media/445177/upl12-01.pdf
Obviously, the goal of the plaintiff’s attorneys is
to get as much money from the insurance policies to receive compensation for
the purported violations. Could the associations have liability too? Who
knows? They might. What happens if the management companies insurance
doesn’t cover the amount if a judgment is secured – or worse yet,
if they don’t have insurance to cover the loss? Anyone can file a
lawsuit and can name an association as a defendant. If you are an officer or
board member in an association you might want to have a talk with your legal
counsel to see what possible liability you and your association might have.
If you physically mail these letters, make sure they are certified letters to make them officially professional and not personal.construction experts
ReplyDeleteThanks for this. I really like what you've posted here and wish you the best of luck with this blog and thanks for sharing. HOA Management Temecula
ReplyDelete